A woman, Ms. A, who threatened soccer player Hwang Eui-jo, who is suspected of illegally filming his private life, has been revealed to be his brother-in-law, and the words she wrote at the time are being revisited.

The Seoul Metropolitan Police Department's Cybercrime Investigation Unit said it sent A, who is suspected of distributing photos and videos of Hwang and other women and threatening them, to prison on Feb. 22.

A was detained on June 25, claiming to be Hwang's former lover and sharing photos and videos of Hwang and women on social media and threatening Hwang on June 16.

Mr. A is Hwang's brother-in-law, who reportedly accompanied him on overseas business trips and acted as his de facto manager. In this regard, a post that Mr. A wrote at the time has been attracting attention again.

"I am a woman who met with Hwang Eui-jo, and he gaslighted numerous women by pretending to be in a relationship with them, sleeping with them, and avoiding establishing a relationship because he had to go overseas again," she wrote on social media, adding, "Many women were victimized similarly to me, and there are many celebrities among them. They were in a relationship at the same time. I don't know how many victims there will be in the future," she wrote, adding, "He is meeting with many people at the same time, whether they are celebrities, influencers, or ordinary people.

"There are videos and photos of dozens of women on his phone that he collected by gaslighting them. Many of them were taken with the women's consent or were stolen. It was no different from the golden phone we heard about. It's a crime," he said. "I'm posting some evidence photos and videos to prove that I'm not spreading falsehoods. This is only a small part of the story. I hope there will be no more victims. The other women are probably not even aware of this. I hope you apologize and stop this behavior. If not, we will publish more."

He also wrote, "Hwang Ui-jo's cell phone and KakaoTalk were all stolen. If you don't want to harm others, admit it and apologize. You've met more celebrities than you can imagine, but did they know about this?" and "Many women who were gaslighted and filmed by him must have thought he was their boyfriend. If you have the integrity to do so, you can have your phone forensically examined and prove otherwise."

At the time, Hwang's management stated, "We are currently clarifying that all of the content uploaded through social networking services is untrue, and we will take strong legal action against them for spreading and disseminating illegally obtained private information about the athlete, and for damaging the athlete's honor." Hwang also released a personal statement, saying, "I have not done anything illegal in my personal life as many are concerned about. The content of the original post is also untrue," he said, adding, "I don't know the person who posted it. He is a criminal who took the opportunity to defame me with falsehoods and threaten me for possessing private videos through illegal channels." 카지노

In the end, Mr. A was charged with defamation under the Information and Communications Network Act and threatening and coercing the use of video footage under the Sexual Violence Punishment Act.

The police confirmed that Mr. A is Hwang's brother-in-law, and are currently investigating why he distributed the video and whether he threatened him. However, Hwang's side reportedly stated that they "do not want to be punished" during the review of Mr. A's arrest warrant on the 16th.

Apart from the investigation into the leak of Hwang's private life, police are also investigating Hwang's alleged illegal filming of sex. On April 18, Hwang was first investigated after his status was switched from complainant to suspect in the alleged illegal filming. Police secured his cell phone and are conducting forensics.

On the 20th, Hwang claimed in a statement that "the video shows a woman who was in a relationship with Hwang in the past, but (the filming) was agreed upon between the lovers at the time."

However, the victim's legal representative refuted the claim in a statement on the 21st, saying, "(The victim) never agreed to the filming, and even when she expressed her intention to refuse, he ignored her and repeated the illegal filming."